Share this

Unmet need

In general, some patients with TNBC have poor outcomes due to recurrence despite their initial treatments.2-4

These high recurrence rates highlight the need for more effective treatments.3

KEYTRUDA® (pembrolizumab), in combination with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and then continued as monotherapy as adjuvant treatment after surgery, is indicated for the treatment of adults with locally advanced, or early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at high risk of recurrence.5

The first and only anti–PD-1 indicated for high-risk early-stage TNBC as a neoadjuvant combination treatment followed by adjuvant monotherapy treatment.5-10

Discover KEYNOTE-522: Efficacy insights

KEYNOTE-522 evaluates the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA® + chemotherapya followed by adjuvant KEYTRUDA® in eTNBC.5

aChemotherapy: Carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by (doxorubicin or epirubicin) and cyclophosphamide.
eTNBC: early triple-negative breast cancer; PD-L1: programmed death ligand 1; TNBC: triple-negative breast cancer.

Watch Professor Schmid, lead investigator of the KEYNOTE-522 trial, discuss the latest results

“The KEYNOTE-522 trial has been a practice-changing trial for patients with stage II or stage III early triple-negative breast cancer.”

Prof. Peter Schmid, FRCP, MD, PhD

Professor Schmid is the clinical director of the Breast Cancer Centre and an honorary consultant medical oncologist at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London. He is also the Chair in Cancer Medicine and the Lead of the Centre of Experimental Cancer Medicine at Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London. Professor Schmid is the lead investigator of the KEYNOTE-522 trial in eTNBC.

eTNBC: early triple-negative breast cancer; FRCP: Fellowship of Royal College of Physicians.

Study treatment arms5,11

  • 2:1 ratio randomisation to the following treatment arms.b,c
  • All study medications were administered via intravenous infusion.
  • Treatment with KEYTRUDA® or placebo continued until completion of treatment (17 cycles), disease progression that precludes definitive surgery, disease recurrence in the adjuvant phase, or unacceptable toxicity.

Primary efficacy outcome measures

  • pCR: Absence of invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/Tis ypN0) and was assessed by the blinded local pathologist at the time of definitive surgery.5
  • EFS: The time from randomisation to the first occurrence of any of the following events: progression of disease that precludes definitive surgery, local or distant recurrence, second primary malignancy, or death due to any cause, in the intention-to-treat population.5

Secondary efficacy outcome measures

  • OS defined as the time from randomisation to death from any cause (key secondary efficacy outcome measure).1
  • pCR defined as ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/Tis in all patients.11
  • pCR according to all definitions in patients with PD-L1–positive tumours.11
  • EFS among patients with PD-L1–positive tumours.11

Safety measures

  • Safety during the neoadjuvant and adjuvant phases was evaluated in all patients who received at least one trial drug, underwent surgery, or both.11

bKEYNOTE-522 is a phase III, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled 1,174 patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated high-risk, locally advanced early-stage or TNBC. Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive either KEYTRUDA® in combination with chemotherapya as neoadjuvant treatment followed by KEYTRUDA® monotherapy as adjuvant treatment after surgery, or placebo and chemotherapya as neoadjuvant treatment followed by placebo after surgery. Treatment with KEYTRUDA® or placebo continued until completion of treatment (17 cycles), disease progression that precludes definitive surgery, disease recurrence in the adjuvant phase, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy outcome measures were pathological complete response and event-free survival. Overall survival was one of several secondary efficacy outcome measures.
cRandomisation was stratified by nodal status (positive vs negative), tumour size (T1/T2 vs T3/T4), and choice of carboplatin (dosed every 3 weeks vs weekly).

AUC: area under the curve; EFS: event-free survival; eTNBC: early triple-negative breast cancer; N: nodal involvement; OS: overall survival; pCR: pathological complete response; PD-L1: programmed death ligand 1; Q3W: every 3 weeks.

Tumour and nodes

7% were primary Tumour 1 (T1), 68% T2, 19% T3, and 7% T4.

49% were nodal involvement 0 (N0), 40% N1, 11% N2, and 0.2% N3.

83% were PD-L1 positive; 17% were PD-L1 negative.11

CI: confidence interval; ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; N: nodal involvement; PD-L1: programmed death ligand 1.

N−: lymph node negative; N+: lymph node positive; PD-L1: programmed death ligand 1.

Pathological complete response (pCR) rate5

The KEYTRUDA® regimen demonstrated less invasive residual tissue in the breast or nodes at the time of definitive surgery and better patient outcomes compared to the placebo regimen.5

Event free survival (EFS):5

Updated EFS1

EFS at 75.1 Months in KEYNOTE-522

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of EFS of 75.1 Months
(Range, 65.9-84.0 Months)

Taken from Schmid et al. Overall survival with pembrolizumab in early-stage triple- negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Nov 28;391(21):1981-1991. Massachusetts Medical Society.
Reprinted with permission from Massachusetts Medical Society.

After a median follow up of ~ 6 years, for patients who received the complete KEYTRUDA® treatment regimen, event free survival (EFS) was consistent with results from previous analysis.

aChemotherapy: Carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by (doxorubicin or epirubicin) and cyclophosphamide.
dBased on Miettinen and Nurminen method stratified by nodal status, tumour size, and choice of carboplatin
eBased on a prespecified pCR final analysis (compared to a significance level of 0.0028).
fOne-sided p-value for testing. H0: difference in %=0 versus H1: difference in %>0.
gBased on Cox regression model with Efron’s method of tie handling with treatment as a covariate stratified by nodal status, tumour size, and choice of carboplatin.

AC: doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide; CI: confidence interval; EC: epirubicin + cyclophosphamide; EFS: event-free survival; HR: hazard ratio; pCR: pathological complete response.

The results from the 7th interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-522 study show, for the first time, statistically significant improved overall survival in eTNBC patients with the KEYTRUDA® treatment regimen compared to the placebo regimen.1

Overall survival1

Kaplan-Meier Curve for Overall Survivalj by Treatment Arm in KEYNOTE-522
(Intention-to-Treat Population)

Taken from The New England Journal of Medicine, Schmid et al. Overall survival with pembrolizumab in early-stage triple- negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(21):1981-1991. Copyright © 2024. Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission from Massachusetts Medical Society.

KEYTRUDA® is the first and only immunotherapy-based regimen to show a statistically significant improvement in OS as neoadjuvant treatment with the KEYTRUDA® combination regimen followed by KEYTRUDA® as a single agent after surgery compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapya followed by placebo after surgery in patients with high-risk eTNBC.1,5-10,12-14

Overall survival data in patients receiving KEYTRUDA® + chemotherapya/KEYTRUDA® vs placebo + chemotherapya/placebo across prespecified subgroups at median follow-up of 75.1 months.1

aChemotherapy: Carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by (doxorubicin or epirubicin) and cyclophosphamide.
hBased on a prespecified OS interim analysis (compared to a significance level of 0.00503)
iThe weighted average hazard ratio with weights of number of events before and after 2-year follow-up was 0.66.
jBased on log-rank test stratified by nodal status, tumour size, and choice of carboplatin.

CI: confidence interval; CPS: combined positive score; eTNBC: early triple-negative breast cancer; HR: hazard ratio; PD-L1: Programmed Death-Ligand 1.

KEYNOTE-522 demonstrated statistically significant improvement in overall survival, meaning more tomorrows for patients who received the complete KEYTRUDA® regimen compared to those who received the placebo regimen.1

The recommended dose of KEYTRUDA® in adults is either 200 mg Q3W or 400 mg Q6W5

When administering KEYTRUDA® as part of a combination with IV chemotherapy, KEYTRUDA® should be administered first as an IV infusion over 30 minutes. For the neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of high-risk early-stage TNBC, patients should be treated with neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA® in combination with chemotherapy for 8 doses of 200 mg Q3W or 4 doses of 400 mg Q6W or until disease progression that precludes definitive surgery or unacceptable toxicity, followed by adjuvant treatment with KEYTRUDA® as monotherapy for 9 doses of 200 mg Q3W or 5 doses of 400 mg Q6W or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who experience disease progression that precludes definitive surgery or unacceptable toxicity related to KEYTRUDA® as neoadjuvant treatment in combination with chemotherapy should not receive KEYTRUDA® monotherapy as adjuvant treatment.

No dose reductions of KEYTRUDA® are recommended. Withhold or discontinue KEYTRUDA® to manage moderate to severe adverse reactions per recommendations in the product labelling.

AUC: area under the curve; BSA: body surface area; IV: intravenous; Q1W: every 1 week; Q3W: every 3 weeks; Q6W: every 6 weeks; TNBC: triple-negative breast cancer.

Summary of safety profile of neoadjuvant KEYTRUDA® + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant KEYTRUDA® monotherapy for TNBC1

In patients with high-risk early-stage TNBC receiving KEYTRUDA® in combination with chemotherapya as a neoadjuvant treatment and continued as monotherapy adjuvant treatment, adverse events listed here occurred during or within 30 days after the treatment period (within 90 days for serious events) in descending order of frequency in the KEYTRUDA® + chemotherapya/KEYTRUDA® group. The as-treated population included all the patients who had undergone randomisation and received at least one trial drug, underwent surgery, or both. The severity of adverse events was graded according to the CTCAE, version 4.0, of the NCI.1

Adverse Events in the Combined Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Phases
(Median Follow-Up 75.1 Months)1

aChemotherapy: Carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by (doxorubicin or epirubicin) and cyclophosphamide.
kTreatment-related adverse events were events that were attributed to a trial treatment by the investigators. Treatment-related adverse events that occurred in at least 20% of the patients in either treatment group are reported. Patients may have had more than one event.
lImmune-mediated adverse events were determined according to a list of terms specified by the sponsor, regardless of attribution to any trial treatment by the investigators. Immune-mediated adverse events that occurred in at least 15 patients in either treatment group are reported.

ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; CTCAE: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; NCI: National Cancer Institute; TNBC: triple-negative breast cancer.

Adjuvant KEYTRUDA® monotherapy is recommended for all patients who have received KEYTRUDA® + chemotherapya in the neoadjuvant setting, regardless of pCR status.15

aChemotherapy: Carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by (doxorubicin or epirubicin) and cyclophosphamide.
mUnless there are risk factors for excessive ICI-associated immune toxicity.

  • First-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
  • ­Treatment of unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer after previous fluoropyrimidine-based combination therapy.

  • Advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, who have disease progression on or following prior treatment with a platinum-containing therapy in any setting and who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation.­
  • Unresectable or metastatic gastric, small intestine, or biliary cancer, who have disease progression on or following at least one prior therapy.

  1. Schmid P, Cortes J, Dent R, et al. Overall survival with pembrolizumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(21):1981-1991.
  2. Stuart-Harris R, Dahlstrom JE, Gupta R, et al. Recurrence in early breast cancer: analysis of data from 3,765 Australian women treated between 1997 and 2015. Breast. 2019;44:153-9.
  3. Gupta GK, Collier AL, Lee D, et al. Perspectives on triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies, unmet needs, and potential targets for future therapies. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9).
  4. Newton EE, Mueller LE, Treadwell SM, et al. Molecular targets of triple-negative breast cancer: where do we stand? Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(3).
  5. KEYTRUDA®. Summary of product characteristics.
  6. Opdivo®. Summary of product characteristics.
  7. Libtayo®. Summary of product characteristics.
  8. Tevimbra®. Summary of product characteristics.
  9. ZYNYZ®. Summary of product characteristics.
  10. Jemperli®. Summary of product characteristics.
  11. Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, et al. Pembrolizumab for early triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):810-21.
  12. Tecentriq®. Summary of product characteristics.
  13. Imfinzi®. Summary of product characteristics.
  14. Bavencio®. Summary of product characteristics.
  15. Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2024;35(2):159-82.
  16. Cain H, Macpherson IR, Beresford M, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy in early breast cancer: treatment considerations and common debates in practice. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017;29(10):642-52.
  17. Croke JM, El-Sayed S. Multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literature. Curr Oncol. 2012;19(4):e232-8.
  18. Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George WD, et al. Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13,722 women. BMJ. 2012;344:e2718.